What important truth do very few people agree with you on?

Originally asked

Peter Thiel, to job candidates, Zero to One, chapter 1, 2014

Peter Thiel, Zero to One, chapter 1, where it is introduced as his job-interview question. Thiel supplies his own standard: a good answer takes the form "most people believe x, but the truth is the opposite of x."

You answer as yourself. Nobody on FLAPSS answers as anybody else.

Recorded Geoffrey Rush said elsewhere, not written here
You now have to address the fact that we might live in so-called wealthy countries at the expense of people who live in poor countries. Our wealth is maybe dependent on somebody else from the poverty side of the equation, suffering on our behalf.

The Talks, The Talks, 18 October 2012 source ↗

Others on this question

View all 15 →
Yvon Chouinard Founder of Patagonia
Everything man does creates more harm than good. We have to accept that fact and not delude ourselves into thinking something is sustainable.
Recorded Jeff Beer, interview, Fast Company, 16 October 2019 source ↗
Leon Panetta Attorney and politician; Director of the Office of Management and Budget, White House Chief of Staff, Director of the CIA and Secretary of Defense
But if our institutions of democracy are not working, that is an even greater threat to our national security
Recorded Cal Fussman, Esquire, 14 December 2012 source ↗
Ephraim Asili Filmmaker, Educator, and DJ
I just don't really see the dialectic between inside and outside, and corporate and revolutionary, as being as cut and dry as I used to.
Recorded Metal Magazine source ↗
Peter Thiel Co-founder of PayPal and Palantir; venture capitalist
My own answer to the contrarian question is that most people think the future of the world will be defined by globalization, but the truth is that technology matters more. Without technological change, if China doubles its energy production over the next two decades, it will also double its air pollution. If every one of India's hundreds of millions of households were to live the way Americans already do — using only today's tools — the result would be environmentally catastrophic. Spreading old ways to create wealth around the world will result in devastation, not riches. In a world of scarce resources, globalization without new technology is unsustainable.
Recorded Excerpt from Zero to One (2014), reproduced by Quartz, Quartz (quoting Zero to One), 2018 source ↗

More from Geoffrey Rush

View profile →

More on values & belief

Also answered this

David Lynch, François Ozon, Ephraim Asili, Henry R. Kravis, Peter Thiel, Arthur Ashkin

Search the directory for somebody in particular.

Explore further

Report this answer