The National Review, on occasion. An attempt to understand the brain wiring of as many points of view as I can.
Originally asked
Vox, to writers and thinkers, 9 Questions, 2017
Vox used this as one of nine fixed questions in its 2017 series on intellectual habits.
You answer as yourself. Nobody on FLAPSS answers as anybody else.
Sean Illing, Vox, “9 questions” series, 8 April 2017 source ↗
Others on this question
View all 27 →It’s very gratifying to grow utterly incensed by the Mail Online and come away from it full of fury and absolute outrage at its prejudice and xenophobia — and support for Brexit.
Firstly, Bob Aumann is a very special man. I disagree with him about his political views – he is a right-wing person. I disagree with him about his current position on “what game theory is about”. From time to time he expresses views – about politics for example – backed with the authority of the great game theoretician. I don’t like those statements. In spite of this fact, I admire him for his academic work and personality.
I often hate-read the Daily Mail. It’s the worst of media and the worst of mankind distilled into one publication and in some ways it feels a moral duty to be familiar with it. Too often we all bolt ourselves into an echo chamber, which I think lacks courage, and can lead to a kind of intellectual conceitedness.
More from Henry Rollins
View profile →Rushing to judgment. Looking for the bad in someone else before anything else.
More on attention & the world
Also answered this
Skye C. Cleary, Adam Gopnik, Alain de Botton, Harry Sidebottom, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Celeste Ng
Search the directory for somebody in particular.
Explore further
- All attention & the world questions
- The 9 Questions questionnaire — 5 questions from the same format
- Explore the archive — by field, age, era, and subject