Values & belief

What important truth do very few people agree with you on?

56 answers answered between 1991 and 2026

Originally asked

Peter Thiel, to job candidates, Zero to One, chapter 1, 2014

Peter Thiel, Zero to One, chapter 1, where it is introduced as his job-interview question. Thiel supplies his own standard: a good answer takes the form "most people believe x, but the truth is the opposite of x."

You answer as yourself. Nobody on FLAPSS answers as anybody else.

Add your answer

On the record

Public figures who have answered a question like this elsewhere. Quoted from the source shown, not written for FLAPSS.

Alan Shepard Naval aviator and astronaut; the first American in space and the fifth person to walk on the Moon
And I say, “Every single dollar that was spent on the space program, went into the pockets of the individuals who worked on it: the contractors, the subcontractors, the vendors. It went to feed their children, put clothes on their back, send them to school.…If we are going to be the leaders of the world, and we are going to worry about trade balance, if we are going to worry about military systems, or solving the problems of the environment, we are going to have to continue to spend money on research, medical research as well.
Recorded Houston, Texas, Academy of Achievement, 1 February 1991 source ↗
Ernst Mayr Naturalist and evolutionary biologist
Primarily to show, and you will think that this doesn't need showing, but lots of people would disagree with you. To show that biology is an autonomous science and should not be mixed up with physics. That's my message.
Recorded Claudio Angelo, Scientific American interview, 6 July 2004 source ↗
Aaron Ciechanover Biologist and physician; Nobel laureate in chemistry for the discovery of ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation
Science for me is a language of peace and the only one I know which is absolutely international. I can talk to a UK scientist or any scientist worldwide about my research and they understand exactly what I am talking about. We may even find an area of mutual interest to collaborate on and together we can make an even greater impact on the world around us.
Recorded Letters, The Guardian, 1 June 2007 source ↗
Ahmed Zewail Chemist; Nobel laureate in Chemistry, 1999
Today I was reading the latest issue of Nature, and somebody had written an editorial that said scientists should be basically directing their work to the service of society by making the discoveries that are relevant. The problem is I don’t know what’s relevant!
Recorded Heidi Aspaturian, Caltech Oral History Project, Caltech Archives Oral History Project, 2015 source ↗
Arthur Ashkin Physicist; Nobel laureate in physics for the invention of optical tweezers
This light is shining on you. Do you know that it's pushing you?…Most people don't. But it is, because it's got energy. The only thing is, it's so small you don't feel it.
Recorded Hilary Brueck, Business Insider interview at Ashkin's home, 26 January 2019 source ↗
Aziz Sancar Biochemist; Nobel laureate in chemistry for mechanistic studies of DNA repair
In an interview, Sancar stated that in his youth, he was an idealist but he didn't participate in activities.
Recorded Anonymous, Interview, Wikipedia, 1 June 2024 source ↗
Ada Yonath Structural biologist; Nobel laureate in Chemistry, 2009
First of all, I believe that the results of science should be fully given to the community. Fully. Absolutely. And all types of competition such as who did it first and “I cannot tell him because he will copy me” and so on – these are not arguments. Society financed this science, if not directly, then the education and the way I got there, so society should get back what I found. It is not my finding. In this, I am not very popular, I must say.
Recorded LW, Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings source ↗

0 answers from members

Nobody has answered this one yet.

More on values & belief